while measuring the I-V characteristic of a two-terminal current source with my Analog Discovery 2, I noticed the vertical position of the trace in the x-y plot is not quite correct. In the following screen capture, CH1 (yellow) is the voltage across the source plus a current measurement (shunt) resistor, and CH2 (blue) is the voltage across the shunt resistor. The x-y plot on the right looks fine on this vertical scale. For example, the CH2 peak is 300 mV in both plots.
When I zoom CH2's vertical scale to more closely examine the difference between the rising and falling halves of the triangle wave, the trace in the x-y plot appears to be too low relative to the x-y plot's graticule. For example, CH2 peaks around 299 mV in the normal y-t trace on the left, but in the x-y plot on the right that peak is low by about 0.3 mV.
Exported data and the cursor suggest the zoomed y-t plot is good, so I'm thinking the calculation for where points go on a vertically zoomed x-y plot is not quite right. Is this something you can look into?
Note this concern is not about the two vertical graticules on the left and right being slightly misaligned. While it would be nice if the two graticules were aligned, my concern is that reading CH2 values off the x-y plot on the right gives me some (slightly) wrong numbers.
Thanks! I'm still having a blast with the AD2. Have a great day.
Question
enelson
Hi,
while measuring the I-V characteristic of a two-terminal current source with my Analog Discovery 2, I noticed the vertical position of the trace in the x-y plot is not quite correct. In the following screen capture, CH1 (yellow) is the voltage across the source plus a current measurement (shunt) resistor, and CH2 (blue) is the voltage across the shunt resistor. The x-y plot on the right looks fine on this vertical scale. For example, the CH2 peak is 300 mV in both plots.
When I zoom CH2's vertical scale to more closely examine the difference between the rising and falling halves of the triangle wave, the trace in the x-y plot appears to be too low relative to the x-y plot's graticule. For example, CH2 peaks around 299 mV in the normal y-t trace on the left, but in the x-y plot on the right that peak is low by about 0.3 mV.
Exported data and the cursor suggest the zoomed y-t plot is good, so I'm thinking the calculation for where points go on a vertically zoomed x-y plot is not quite right. Is this something you can look into?
Note this concern is not about the two vertical graticules on the left and right being slightly misaligned. While it would be nice if the two graticules were aligned, my concern is that reading CH2 values off the x-y plot on the right gives me some (slightly) wrong numbers.
Thanks! I'm still having a blast with the AD2. Have a great day.
Added appropriate tags.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
5 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now