We are using an external trigger and an external clock to acquire a signal on AI0 of a DT9844.
The external clock is a square wave, 50% duty cycle, 500KHz
The external trigger is a square wave, 50% duty cycle, 300Hz.
The AI0 input is a a square wave, 50% duty cycle, 150Hz, 0 to 5V
AI0 is configured to scan the channel list (AI0 only) 100 times, to collect 100 samples per scan and to buffer a total of 10000 samples to display.
We anticipated the displayed buffer to have 10000 samples, looking like a square wave of 100 samples at 5V followed by 100 samples of 0V repeated 50 times.
We were able to configure an NI6343 to collect in this manner and the displayed output was what was expected. The block diagram and output display from the NI6343 are show below. The display shows the signal for one triggered scan and the complete buffer.
Also shown below are the block diagram for the DT9844 and the output display. While the display for one triggered scan is what was expected, the complete buffer was not.
The number of samples per scan, scan count and buffer size may not be configured properly and are likely the cause for the 10000 buffered samples to seem to be random.
It there an improper configuration for these parameter in the block diagram?
Question
Grata
We are using an external trigger and an external clock to acquire a signal on AI0 of a DT9844.
The external clock is a square wave, 50% duty cycle, 500KHz
The external trigger is a square wave, 50% duty cycle, 300Hz.
The AI0 input is a a square wave, 50% duty cycle, 150Hz, 0 to 5V
AI0 is configured to scan the channel list (AI0 only) 100 times, to collect 100 samples per scan and to buffer a total of 10000 samples to display.
We anticipated the displayed buffer to have 10000 samples, looking like a square wave of 100 samples at 5V followed by 100 samples of 0V repeated 50 times.
We were able to configure an NI6343 to collect in this manner and the displayed output was what was expected. The block diagram and output display from the NI6343 are show below. The display shows the signal for one triggered scan and the complete buffer.
Also shown below are the block diagram for the DT9844 and the output display. While the display for one triggered scan is what was expected, the complete buffer was not.
The number of samples per scan, scan count and buffer size may not be configured properly and are likely the cause for the 10000 buffered samples to seem to be random.
It there an improper configuration for these parameter in the block diagram?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
2 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now