I am working on an application that requires me to read the current position of upto 6 encoders at a minimum sample rate of 1000Hz (or every 1ms) to track the movement of joints. I am considering using the USB-QUAD08 but I am unable to find any benchmarks in the documentation regarding how fast one single read takes using either ulCIn or scanning continuously using ulCInScan.
If I were to start scanning using ulCInScan(daqDeviceHandle, 0, 6, 1, 6000, scanOptions, flags, buffer); would I expect to get a new counter measurement for all 6 encoders every millisecond?
Question
Tanmay Parikh
Hi All,
I am working on an application that requires me to read the current position of upto 6 encoders at a minimum sample rate of 1000Hz (or every 1ms) to track the movement of joints. I am considering using the USB-QUAD08 but I am unable to find any benchmarks in the documentation regarding how fast one single read takes using either ulCIn or scanning continuously using ulCInScan.
If I were to start scanning using ulCInScan(daqDeviceHandle, 0, 6, 1, 6000, scanOptions, flags, buffer); would I expect to get a new counter measurement for all 6 encoders every millisecond?
Edited by Tanmay ParikhLink to comment
Share on other sites
0 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now