I'd like to compare the I2S input to the anlog output of a Class-D Amp in "Scope" in Waveforms. With V3.22.27 this is kindof possible by first adding a digital I2S channel and then adding a custom Math channel with the formula "I2S". However this doesn't doesn't apply the two's complement claculation and always shows both channels, resulting in a chopped waveform compared to the . Is there a way to also apply the Settings for the digital I2S channel (especially "Format:" and "Show:") to the waveform displayed in the scope?
Here's a screenshot. The green waveform is the current way it's decoded it and the bottom black waveform would be the ideal version:
I've tried to cheat it a bit by manually "decoding" the two's complement in the custom math function but I'm not able to get rid of the chopping.
Thanks!
Ps. to everyone working on this project, it's absolutely incredibly how much is possible with such an inexpensive tool and great software! I'll chose Waveforms over the laggy touch screen interface of a $10,000 Rhode&Schwarz every day ;)
Question
Jonathan MB
Hi everyone,
I'd like to compare the I2S input to the anlog output of a Class-D Amp in "Scope" in Waveforms. With V3.22.27 this is kindof possible by first adding a digital I2S channel and then adding a custom Math channel with the formula "I2S". However this doesn't doesn't apply the two's complement claculation and always shows both channels, resulting in a chopped waveform compared to the . Is there a way to also apply the Settings for the digital I2S channel (especially "Format:" and "Show:") to the waveform displayed in the scope?
Here's a screenshot. The green waveform is the current way it's decoded it and the bottom black waveform would be the ideal version:
I've tried to cheat it a bit by manually "decoding" the two's complement in the custom math function but I'm not able to get rid of the chopping.
Thanks!
Ps. to everyone working on this project, it's absolutely incredibly how much is possible with such an inexpensive tool and great software! I'll chose Waveforms over the laggy touch screen interface of a $10,000 Rhode&Schwarz every day ;)
Link to comment
Share on other sites
3 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now