For the Analog Discovery 2, in Section 2 of the "Using the Impedance Analyzer" documentation, a table is provided to identify proper selection of a reference resistor versus a capacitance or inductance being analyzed. ( Table image attached ).
The "Ref Resistor" and "Inductance" columns of the table list values in successive powers of 10. However, the "Capacitance" column in the table does not provide an entry for 100 nF ( i.e. 10 times 10 nF or 1 uF divided by 10 ).
If the Table is incorrect, please provide a corrected version of it.
If the Table is correct, please explain the reason for the apparent inconsistency.
Question
Systems_Engineer
For the Analog Discovery 2, in Section 2 of the "Using the Impedance Analyzer" documentation, a table is provided to identify proper selection of a reference resistor versus a capacitance or inductance being analyzed. ( Table image attached ).
The "Ref Resistor" and "Inductance" columns of the table list values in successive powers of 10. However, the "Capacitance" column in the table does not provide an entry for 100 nF ( i.e. 10 times 10 nF or 1 uF divided by 10 ).
If the Table is incorrect, please provide a corrected version of it.
If the Table is correct, please explain the reason for the apparent inconsistency.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
2 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now